Manchester City Council

Agenda item

Agenda item

Our Manchester - financial impact on decision making and business planning

Presentation by the City Treasurer


This presentation provides an of the Our Manchester Strategy and how this is helping to deliver the required Council savings targets and the effect that it will have on the Councils future budget process


The Committee considered a presentation that provided an evaluation of Our Manchester and how this was helping to deliver the required Council savings targets and the effect that it would have on the Council’s future budget process. The presentation started by setting out the Our Manchester approach, then showed how the Monitoring and Evaluation framework operated and finally covered how this related to savings delivery and budget strategy.


Officers referred to the main points and themes within the presentation, which included:-


·                An overview of Our Manchester, including an explanation of the different roles of the Our Manchester Strategy and approach, including the role of Bringing Services Together

·                The monitoring and evaluation framework, outlining the approach to monitoring and evaluating Our Manchester;

·                A summary of how Our Manchester was being put into practise as evidenced through Our Manchester updates to scrutiny committees and case studies;

·                How Our Manchester had fed into our allocation of resources through the business planning process; and

·                Monitoring and budget strategy impact, including how the Council monitors progress towards the vision for the city through the State of the City Report and how this impacts on the Council’s budget position.


Some of the key points that arose from the Committees discussions were: -


·                A distinction needed to be made between the Voluntary and Community Sector and Community Groups;

·                Resilient communities that had delivered positive outcomes appeared to have been penalised through reduced resources;

·                More needed to be done to support community groups to compliment and support the ambitions for social prescribing in communities;

·                Would Social Value be included as a key metric in the State of the City Report;

·                Commenting that the metrics within the State of the City report were very challenging, especially around the issues of life expectancy and victim based crime;  

·                Noting the success of the Wigan Deal in managing and communicating expectations with residents, what similar work was being done in Manchester to raise awareness of Our Manchester with residents, commenting that there appeared to be currently a disconnect;

·                ‘Have your say’ events should be delivered across the whole of the city as a mechanism to engage with residents;

·                How was spend against outcome measured and assessed;

·                What resources were allocated to the analysis of the impact of ‘Our Manchester’, noting the complexity and range of metrics; and

·                Noting the importance of the interactions between frontline staff and residents, staff needed to be empowered to influence appropriate change.


Officers stated that the Our Manchester Investment Fund was designed to facilitate innovative approaches and build resilience within communities to reduce the demand on services. Officers stated that the new health model had been supported by funding from Greater Manchester and a business case was being developed to further support community groups to assist with social prescribing. Officers described that conversations were ongoing with a range of services and partners, including the police and health to align the geographical footprint in which they worked to deliver services and support the ‘Our Manchester’ approach.


Officers stated that consideration would be given as to how social value could be reported within future State of the City reports. Officers acknowledged the challenges to improve against key metrics, noting that a range of partners, such as health and the police and national policies would have an influence on these outcomes. Officers further stated that there was a challenge to report on how ‘Our Manchester’ had impacted on these, noting that the Logic model and analysis of data would assist with that reporting and measuring impact and outcomes. Officers stated that it was important to recognise that the data within the State of the City report was collated over the year however the report was published on an annual basis and used the data available at the time of publication.


In response to a request from a Member, Officers commented that the data was complex and available at different times of the year, however consideration would be given on how best to report performance to the Committee throughout the year, noting that the intention is to review and report annually on the impact and performance of Our Manchester, and consideration was being given on how to capture and report added value, considering all of the contributing factors as a metric.


Officers stated that there were a number of different methods employed to engage with and communicate ‘Our Manchester’ with residents. These included the delivery of ‘Have Your Say’ events in a range of neighbourhood settings with the intention to roll these out across the whole of the city; integrating services within neighbourhoods; joined up resident engagement with partners to ensure a consistent message is communicated. Officers stated the challenge was then to understand and measure the outcomes of such events and interventions, however work was progressing to capture and measure this. Noting the comment from the Member regarding the need for clear communications with residents regarding expectations, Officers stated that this would be reviewed in consultation with the communications team, noting the model adopted in Wigan.


In regard to spend and outcomes, Officers reported that this was assessed and an analysis and review of the success of interventions would be undertaken, using the lessons learnt from other experiences. Officers reported that analysis of the Our Manchester approach was undertaken by the existing Performance, Reform and Innovation Team, stating that a dedicated officer would be allocated to focus specifically on this area of work. Officers reported that consideration was also being given to appointing an academic researcher to support this work and the funding options for this were being explored. Officers reported that a number of staff across the organisation had contributed to the Logic model work.


Officers noted the importance of both Council staff and the staff of partners when interacting with residents to influence behaviour change and that staff awareness and engagement sessions were being delivered to all staff, further complimented by the ‘Our People’ HR strategy to drive culture change and embed the Our Manchester principals in the workforce and across all services.




The Committee:-


(1)          Recommends that a one-page document is produced, similar to that available in Wigan, that clearly communicates with residents the Our Manchester approach and expectations.  


(2)          Recommends that analysis of the development and empowerment of those front line staff who regularly engage with residents, across a range of services is undertaken.


Supporting documents: